When I read this article by Richard Florida, entitled “The Global Tourism Backlash”, it reminded me of my own master’s thesis at George Washington University about the negative effects of international tourism on small Caribbean island nations. Back then, as now, tourists can overrun places, affecting the local culture, environment, transportation and economy. Back then, as now, tourism can also be a boon to the local economy and a force for positive change. These arguments are similar to those concerning the effects of urban gentrification. I can’t help but believe these conversations are also a backlash against the borderless world spawned by post- WWII globalization and the new fluidity of our urban and cultural boundaries. How can we maintain the benefits of this fluidity without turning every place of history and art into a theme park, or hipster watering hole? Who has the right to benefit (financially) from this? What happens when more than half of the planet, recently deemed “middle class or more” has the resources to travel to your city to see your great sites, clog your roads, and generally misbehave?
What rights must we have to maintain some semblance of “order”. Who is “WE” , anyway? And who are “THEY”?
Read More